Download a Copy of the Complete decision in PDF here.
Download a Copy of the Complete decision in PDF here.
Simplified Legal information for everyone | Trusted Legal Analysis for Lawyers | Legal Support for Your Business
Download a Copy of the Complete decision in PDF here.
Download a Copy of the Complete decision in PDF here.
You can download a full copy of the Judgment in PDF format here.
This Landmark case is often called the ‘Paisley Snail’ or ‘Snail in a bottle’ case.
You can download a full copy of the Judgment in PDF format here. This Landmark case is often called the ‘Paisley Snail’ or ‘Snail in a bottle’ case.
In Nigeria, buying a piece of land that has a small court case is not the wisest choice of action. This is because of the legal doctrine called lis pendis.
A person who buys a property while a court case is on-going over it (that is when the property is under litigation) has bought the court case for himself as well. In other words, he has bought his way into the litigation and his gains, fortunes and ownership of the property will depend on the result or outcome of the court case.
We will quote extensively from a judgment of the Court of Appeal on this issue. Yes we know it might be a mouthful to read but we will explain what it means.
“The doctrine of lis pendens applies in respect of title to property. By this doctrine, when title to property is the subject matter of litigation, all intending sales must abate, pending the outcome of the litigation. It operates to prevent the effective transfer of any property in dispute during the pendency of that dispute. In its application, it is irrelevant whether the purchaser has notice – whether actual or constructive. By the operation of this doctrine, a vendor is deprived of any rights over property in dispute during the currency of the litigation, and, for this reason, a vendor cannot transfer any effective title to a purchaser over the same property. Indeed, the principle of nemo dat quod non habet would apply to defeat any sale or transfer of such property made during the pendency of the litigation.
JUSTICE ONYEKACHI AJA OTISI, JCA (Pp 35 – 36 Paras E – F) in AINA & ANOR v. OMOTADE & ORS (2021) LPELR-56226(CA)
In Nigeria, buying a piece of land that has a small court case is not the wisest choice of action. This is because of the legal doctrine called lis pendis. What does Lis Pendis Mean? How Does Lis Pendis Affect the buying of a Property? A person who buys a property while a court case is on-going over it
Garnishee proceedings is one of the ways of enforcing money judgments in Nigeria. The nature of the garnishee proceedings is as prescribed in Section 83 to 92 of the Sheriffs and Civil Process Act. The procedure allows the judgment creditor to reap the fruits of the judgment by recovering debts owed by third parties to the judgment debtor. The garnishees are in some cases banks and the debts are usually the monies in the account of the judgment debtor domiciled in the banks. Although garnishee proceedings are usually an offshoot of judgments, the proceedings are in a class of its own. A garnishee proceedings is instituted by a person who has obtained judgment in its favour. The essence of the proceedings is to ask the court to compel a third party in possession of funds belonging to the judgment debtor to give up such funds to the person who has obtained the judgment, that is, the judgment creditor.
Step 1:
Obtain a judgment of court: Garnishee proceedings are predicated on a judgment of court. Thus, the judgment creditor will need to obtain the Certified True Copy (CTC) of the judgment. The CTC will be relevant for the next procedural step.
Step 2:
Prepare and file an application to the court for the grant of a Garnishee Order Nisi. The application is usually a motion ex parte with a supporting affidavit. The CTC of the judgment has to be attached to the supporting affidavit as an exhibit. If the rules of court of your state of jurisdiction requires, you can accompany the motion with a written address.
Step 3:
Appear in court on the stipulated date and move your application. Once the court is satisfied with the facts supporting your application, the Garnishee Order Nisi will be granted.
Step 4:
Once the Order Nisi is made, approach the registrar of court to draw up the order for service on the garnishees. Obtain the enrolled order and effect service of the same on the garnishees and the judgment debtor. Once the garnishees are served with the order, they will appear, as mandated by the order, to explain why the order should not be made absolute against them. They would do that by filing what is called an “Affidavit to Show Cause”.
Step 5:
On the next adjourned date, the Garnishees will appear in court to show cause. The Judgment Creditor’s lawyer will apply to the court to discharge the garnishees who have shown that they are not in possession of the judgment debtor’s funds. It is usually an oral application. Then, the lawyer can proceed to orally apply to the court to make the Garnishee Order Absolute against the garnishees who have disclosed being in possession of the judgment debtor’s funds. The Order Absolute directs the garnishees to pay the money belonging to the judgment debtor to the judgment creditor.
Step 6: Draft a demand letter and attach the enrolled order Absolute. Dispatch the demand letter and its attachment to the garnishees.
Written by Queen Charles Ukpo ESQ
Garnishee proceedings is one of the ways of enforcing money judgments in Nigeria. The nature of the garnishee proceedings is as prescribed in Section 83 to 92 of the Sheriffs and Civil Process Act. The procedure allows the judgment creditor to reap the fruits of the judgment by recovering debts owed by third parties to the judgment debtor. The garnishees
The detention of a patient who cannot pay his medical bills is not a practice that is allowed or backed up by the law. Such a detention could render the hospital or medical personnel who is responsible liable in an action for trespass to the patient (and more particularly the tort of false imprisonment – IGBOERI (2010) LPELR-4712(CA). Put simply, this means that the patient can sue the Hospital and ask the Court for monetary compensation on the basis that he or she has been falsely imprisoned by the Hospital.
The tort of false imprisonment is the restraining or detaining of a person, if the person doing or causing the imprisonment has no right in law to imprison that other. (A tort is a civil wrong that causes a claimant to suffer loss or harm and leads to legal liability on the person who committed the tortious action).
In effect, the indebtedness of a patient does not give a hospital the right (in law) to detain such a patient. In fact, detaining a patient who has not paid his medical bill constitutes an infringement on such a patient’s rights to liberty and freedom of movement both enshrined in Sections 35 and 41 of the 1999 Constitution respectively. It would also amount to an infringement of the patient’s right under Article 11 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
In 2018, the High Court of Anambra State held a hospital that detained an indebted patient liable for the tort of false imprisonment and awarded damages in the sum of N500,000 in damages against the hospital. You can read about this case HERE.
Also, the use of the Police to recover debt is not a practice sanctioned by the law. The Police are not debt recovery agents. As a corollary, being indebted is not a crime that could snowball or lead to criminal proceedings against a debtor. Where a party (a hospital in this instance) uses the instrument of the Police to intimidate or oppress an indebted patient, he does not go free. By a host of Court cases, the private individual who uses the police to settle a private score, would himself be liable for the wrongful act of the police. The Courts have held that a person who employs the police, or any law enforcement agency, to violate the fundamental rights of another citizen should be ready to face the consequences, either alone or with the misguided government agency.
Written by Frederick Nkobowo BL, LL.B
Our Authorities for the above include –
You can read more on the practice and its legality here –
Hospital Detention is Illegal The detention of a patient who cannot pay his medical bills is not a practice that is allowed or backed up by the law. Such a detention could render the hospital or medical personnel who is responsible liable in an action for trespass to the patient (and more particularly the tort of false imprisonment – IGBOERI
Having been an Associate at the International Federation of Women Lawyers (FIDA), Rivers State Branch, and attended to several matrimonial causes cases, coupled with the news making the rounds about Steve Harvey’s wife asking for $200m in alimony after cheating on him, and the now old story of Achraf Hakimi wife who discovered all her husband’s properties was in his mother’s name, it appears to me that Nigerians will also settle for alimony in a failed relationship. This is quite understandable against the background that parties to a marriage in several instances have had to make compromises in every aspect of their lives; ranging from their jobs to their personal identities, and individual choices. The list is endless. Here, I have tried to answer a few questions you may have about Alimony, as practiced in Nigeria.
According to the Black’s Law Dictionary, alimony is an allowance paid by one spouse to another by order of the court for maintenance of the other spouse while they are separated, during divorce proceedings, or after they have divorced. In Nigeria, there is no mention of the word “Alimony” anywhere in our laws. What our Matrimonial Causes Act LFN 1990 (being the principal law on the subject) in its Part IV provides for is “Maintenance, custody and settlement”. The Law has done away with the confusing terminologies of “alimony” and “maintenance” by only using the word “maintenance” even when alimony in the conventional sense is what is intended. However, I will be using the terms “Alimony” and “maintenance” interchangeably, for easy understanding.
It can only be ordered by a court, and ordered against either the male spouse or the female spouse. Alimony is not only paid by a husband to his wife. Depending on the circumstance of each case, wives do pay alimony to their husbands too.
It is to finance the maintenance of the “deserving” other spouse/party at any stage of divorce proceedings or beyond. Note that alimony is not a punitive cost nor is it awarded to mark the misconduct of either of the parties to the proceedings; it is not a punishment for the actions/inactions of any of the spouse. An adulterous man is not made to pay for his wife’s maintenance because he committed adultery. The sole purpose of making an order for the payment of alimony is to see to the maintenance of a deserving spouse.
Yes. Maintenance can ONLY be ordered by a Court where parties conduct Statutory marriage (either valid or void), which is what people call “Court marriage”, or even when done in church, the church is a registered place, authorized by law to celebrate legal marriages. This means that alimony cannot be ordered where parties are only married under customary (traditional) law or Muslim rites.
See Section 69 Matrimonial Causes Act.
This means that if you are not legally married, you are not entitled to alimony. I have had to deal with cases where parties had cohabited for a long time and suddenly the man is no longer interested in the relationship and the woman starts feeling entitled to the wealth “she helped him build”, Unfortunately, the law does not back you up. You are not entitled to anything. Your best option is suing for “breach of promise to marry”. I will refer you to this article to learn more about this option.
No. The award of alimony is at the discretion of the court, that is a court of law is not bound to order alimony against any party in every divorce proceedings in Nigeria. The Court can make the order based on a number of factors including the means, earning capacity, and conduct of the parties to the marriage and all other relevant circumstances, based on the evidence before it.
See Section 70 (1) Matrimonial Causes Act.
The court considers the following factors before making the order:
The maintenance order or alimony sought, if granted by the court, may be ordered to be paid in a lump sum, weekly, monthly or as the court may deem fit to order.
Yes, the existence of children can affect the amount paid for alimony (maintenance). However, an order for the maintenance of children of the marriage does not cover a child who has attained the age of 21 years unless the court is of the opinion that there are special circumstances that justify the making of such an order for the benefit of that child. The court in cases like these, directly or indirectly relating to children, always regards the interests of those children as the paramount consideration
See Section 70 (4) of the Matrimonial Causes Act
Alimony payments involve two parties: the paying spouse (obligor) and the receiving spouse (obligee). The obligor has the right to challenge or request a review of the amount of alimony ordered by the court, in the absence of these, the obligor has an obligation to pay the amount of alimony ordered by the court. Failure to do so can result in legal consequences such as contempt of court charges.
The obligee has the right to receive alimony payments as ordered by the court and the obligation to use alimony payments for their intended purpose. They also have a right to request a review of the alimony order if their financial circumstances change.
Note: A maintenance order made may be discharged if the party in whose favor it was made marries again or if there is any other just cause for so doing.
The following cases are instructive for your understanding of the subject:
Written by Imeh Imeh ESQ
Having been an Associate at the International Federation of Women Lawyers (FIDA), Rivers State Branch, and attended to several matrimonial causes cases, coupled with the news making the rounds about Steve Harvey’s wife asking for $200m in alimony after cheating on him, and the now old story of Achraf Hakimi wife who discovered all her husband’s properties was in his
The Personal Income Tax is guided by the Personal Income Tax Act Cap P8 LFN 2004 (as amended)
Your personal income is total amount of money you make from any trade, business, profession or vocation and pension received from such.
The tax is imposed on income of all Individuals, Communities, Families and Trustees or Executors and is to be paid to the State of their residency for each year, i.e., the State’s Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Residents of FCT – Abuja, persons employed in the Nigerian Armed Forces (Army, Navy and Air Force), Police officers, officers of the Nigerian Foreign Service and a person resident outside Nigeria who derives income or profit from Nigeria, are all to pay to the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS).
Note that some nonresidents of Nigeria may still be taxed in Nigeria under certain conditions, such as where the business or trade producing the income for them is wholly or partially carried on or deemed to be carried on in Nigeria.
“gross income” means income from all sources less all non-taxable income, income on which no further tax is payable, items exempted from tax and all allowable business expenses and capital allowance.
No, not all of your income will be taxed. “Chargeable/taxable income” is the amount of the total income of an individual for a year, after any income exempted has been excluded and the deductions allowed by the Act have been made.
Income exempted from taxation are those as stated in the Third Schedule of the Personal Income Tax Act.
While the deductions to be made before arriving at your taxable income are all outgoing and expenses, or any part thereof, wholly, exclusively, necessarily and reasonably incurred during that period and ultimately borne by you in the production of the income. Such as:
Additionally, the government has granted a tax relief under the heading “Personal relief and relief for children, dependents”. The government is giving up taxing you a part of your annual income. They expect that you use this money to take care of yourself, children and dependents. It is called the “Consolidation Relief Allowance” and it is N200,000.00 or 1% of gross income whichever is higher, plus 20 % of the gross income.
The balance from all these deductions, exemptions and relief is what shall be taxable.
There shall be allowed a deduction of the annual amount of any premium paid by the individual during the year preceding the year of assessment to an insurance company in respect of insurance on his life or the life of his spouse, or of a contract for deferred annuity on his own life or the life of his spouse
No. No deduction shall be allowed to you unless you claim it in writing in such form as the relevant tax authority may prescribe.
The rate of the tax ranges from 7% to 24%, depending on the amount of chargeable income – Individuals are subject to minimum tax of 1% of gross income where the income is less than N300,000 per annum.
After the relief allowance, deductions and exemptions had been granted in accordance with the law, the balance of income shall be taxed as specified in the following tax table:
You do. A taxable person (such as yourself) is required to file a return of income and in the return, calculate the amount of tax payable in the prescribed form.
Every taxable person (such as yourself) is required to keep Books of Accounts which will be used by the tax authority to verify your calculated tax. If you fail or refuse to keep books of accounts which, in the opinion of the relevant tax authority, are adequate for the purpose of the tax, you are be liable on conviction to a penalty of N50,000 for individuals and N500,000 for corporate entities.
Furthermore, for the purpose of obtaining full information in respect of your income or gain, the relevant tax authority may give you notice requiring you to complete and deliver any return to the tax authority, personally attend before an officer of the relevant tax authority for examination with respect to any matter relating to such income gains, produce for examination any book, document, account and return which the relevant tax authority may deem necessary or give orally or in writing any other information including a name and address specified in the notice.
If you are in salary employment as your only source of income, the above does not apply to you because your employer is responsible for your PAYE tax.
You are required by law to file a return of income every year, without notice or demand, with the tax authority of the State in which you are deemed to be a resident. The return of income is expected to state the amount of income and particulars to any such income, allowance, relief, deduction or otherwise as may be material for that purpose from every source of the preceding year. Notwithstanding that a tax authority requires you to file a return containing the amount of your income for each year, a person whose only source of income in any year of assessment is employment is such that he earns N30,000 or less from that source is not required to file return of income.
The due date for filing returns of the tax is 31st March of every year (within ninety days from the commencement of every year of assessment). Note that a person who files his/her return within the time specified for filing of the return shall, if there is no default in the payment arrangement, be granted a bonus of 1% of the tax payable.
You shall be liable on conviction to a fine of N5,000 and a further sum of N100 for every day during which the failure continues or imprisonment of six (6) months or both. Also, the relevant tax authority may proceed to assess you as a taxable person chargeable with income tax after the expiration of the time allowed for the delivery of the return (after 31st March of every year).
Income tax charged by an assessment which is not or has not been the subject of an objection or appeal, shall be payable within two months after the date of service of that notice.
If you do not pay within the period, a sum equal to ten % per annum of the tax shall be added, and the provisions of the Act relating to the recovery and collection of tax shall apply to the recovery and collection of that sum.
The relevant tax authority shall serve a demand note on you and, if payment is not made within one month from the date of the service of the demand note, the relevant tax authority may proceed to enforce the payment.
The penalty imposed is not be deemed to be part of the tax paid for the purpose of claiming relief.
If without lawful justification or excuse, of which burden of proving rests on you, you fail to pay the income tax within the period of one month, you are guilty of an offence.
Yes. The tax due from a taxable person shall carry interest on annual basis at bank base lending rate from the date when the tax becomes payable until it is paid.
By obtaining your tax clearance certificate. Whenever the relevant tax authority is of opinion that for the three years immediately preceding the current year of assessment, fully paid or that no tax is due on your income or that you are not liable to tax for any of those three years, it shall issue you with a tax clearance certificate within two weeks of your demand for the certificate. That the payment of current year tax shall not be made a condition for the issuance of the certificate unless you are leaving the country finally.
A tax clearance certificate contains the following in respect of the last three years of assessment –
A ministry, department or an agency of government or a commercial bank with whom you have any dealing with respect to any transactions may demand your tax clearance certificate for the three years immediately preceding the current year of assessment and shall verify the genuineness by referring same to the issuing tax authority before conducting such transaction with you.
Such transactions include:
Note the following, if;
You are guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a fine of N50,000 plus twice the tax payable by you or to imprisonment for three years or to both such fine and imprisonment.
A person, ministry, department or an agency of government or a commercial bank, who fails to request for your tax clearance certificate before performing such transaction with you is guilty of an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine of N5,000,000.00 or to imprisonment for 3 years or both fine and imprisonment.
P.A.Y.E. refers to “Pay As You Earn”. It is a method used to deduct personal income tax at the source the moment an employee earns their salary. It is deducted by the employer and paid to the relevant tax authority on behalf of the employee.
Every employer shall be required to file a return with the relevant tax authority of all emoluments paid to its employees, not later than 31st January of every year in respect of all employees in its employment in the preceding year failure which such employer shall be liable on conviction to a penalty of N500,000 in the case of a body corporate and N50,000 in the case of an individual.
As an employer, you are expected to remit the P.A.Y.E tax of your employees by the 10th day of every succeeding month. This day is called the due date for remittance.
The Tax Appeal Tribunal has the powers to entertain all cases arising from operations of this Personal Income Tax Act.
CONSOLIDATED SALARY / GROSS EMOLUMENT
Determine the consolidated salary which is the gross emolument of the Tax Payer Per Annum. That is Basic Salary, Housing, Transport, Leave, Utility, Furniture, Meal Allowances etc.
Multiply by 12 to get the gross Per Annum
Item | Amount ( | |
1. | Basic Salary | 50,000 |
2. | Housing | 20,000 |
3. | Transport | 10,000 |
4. | Meal | 10,000 |
5. | Furniture | 10,000 |
TOTAL |
Total consolidated salary is N100,000 Per Month.
Therefore N1,200,000 Per Annum (N100,000 X 12)
A Tax relief of N200,000.00 or 1% of the Consolidated Salary, whichever is higher, plus 20% of the Consolidated Salary is given.
Less N200,000 from the N1,200,000
Also less 20% from N1,200,000 = N240,0000.
Therefore CRA = N200,000 + N240,000 = N440,000.
Check Tax payer’s contribution in any of the following:
Compute taxable income based on steps 1 to 3 which is less CRA from consolidated salary.
N1,200,000 – N440,000 (CRA) = N760,000.
Therefore, for earnings of N1,200,000, the chargeable income therefore is N760,000.
Apply the Tax Band to the Chargeable Income to arrive at the tax payable per annum:
First N300,000 @ 7% N21,000
Next N300,000 @ 11% N33,000
Next N500,000 @ 15% N75,000
Next N500,000 @ 19% N95,000
Next N1,600,000 @ 21% N336,000
Over N3,200,000 @ 24%
Therefore, for a Chargeable Income of N760,000 the Tax will be:
1st N300,000 @ 7% = N21,000 (Remaining N460,000)
Next N300,000@11% = N33,000 (Remaining N160,000)
Next N500,000 @ 15% = N160,000 X 15% = N24,000
Total Tax payable per Annum = N21,000 + N33,000 + N24,000 = N78,000 PA
The Tax Payable Per Annum is divided by 12
N78,000 divided by 12 = N6,500 Per Month.
Therefore the tax payable every month shall be N6,500 on the PAYE Scheme.
Where the Chargeable Income obtained is lower than 1% of the consolidated or gross emolument then 1% of the consolidated salary shall be the Tax Payable Per Annum
Written by Imeh Imeh LLB, BL
What Law Guides Personal Income Tax (PIT) in Nigeria The Personal Income Tax is guided by the Personal Income Tax Act Cap P8 LFN 2004 (as amended) What is your Personal Income? Your personal income is total amount of money you make from any trade, business, profession or vocation and pension received from such. Who is to Pay the Personal
MY EXPERIENCE
I began my advocacy journey while in my first year with participation in webinars, workshops and seminars on learning the rudiments of advocacy and what it takes for one to thrive in it. Basically, as at then, I had keen interest in Litigation (even till now, my interest is not as intense as it used to be. Lol). Consequently, I dedicated my full time to committing myself to great learning of what advocacy (participation in moot and mock competitions) entails. While as a fresher, I was drafted into a chamber (out rightly the best chamber in my faculty at the moment) where I could learn more about advocacy, participate directly in moot and mock competitions and enjoy the leverage to perfect any craft in me. I was directly coached and trained by my seniors who showed me the way to get things done – precisely what it takes to thrive in it. I was thirsty for knowledge and eager to learn everything it takes but I later figured out the learning is a gradual process as it never stops.
I was well coached and was given the necessary exposure to the life in advocacy. I was made to realize that full commitment to this new life would preclude me from access to every social life a student on campus would wish to enjoy. But I settled within myself that since I am on an academic journey, I need not bother about social life as such – very hard to conclude as I am a social type, I just had to accept things that way.
In my first year, I participated in my first moot competition within my faculty when I led my team from my chamber through intense preliminary rounds to the semi finals before I faced a seemingly tougher team. Lol. At every stage, I always learned new things. Most importantly, the role of ‘confidence’ and ‘delivery’ in oral advocacy. I did not stop there, I went back to my drawing board to catch more glimpse of what I still needed to learn, meet up with more senior colleagues within the faculty and outside the school, attended more webinars, and watched keenly the court appearance of senior colleagues.
Then in my second year, I was more eager to put everything I have learnt and observed into practice. I participated in another moot competition in the first semester of my second year, led my team again and emerged best counsel in two consecutive preliminary rounds of the competition. While this is not to tooth my horn but I would say the best counsel awards gave me more recognition beyond my chamber, to the entire faculty as a whole.
However, I knew I still needed more things to learn as I was not satisfied with my records. So I did not get relaxed but rather thirsty to learn more. I sought more knowledge from new moot tutors.
Suffice it here to say that my great thirst in advocacy was firstly spurred while I was a law aspirant by the sterling records of my seniors who have gone ahead of me. I read their stories online and I was wowed by their feats, how much they have achieved and how far they had gone. I was ready to take up the mantle upon my resumption and give my own best. I was not so sure where my best would lead me to, but I was certain my best would lead me somewhere – I can not learn and practice so hard and not get a giant leap, was my full conviction. Upon resumption, I heard directly from my seniors a more elaborate story of the great successes the seniors who had gone far ahead made during their undergraduate days. I was motivated by all these and was ready to give my own best.
In the early period of the second semester of my second year, I participated in another moot competition where my team made it to the finals and I was once again awarded the best counsel of the final round. The moments are still fresh in memory but the records was not enough, after all, man is insatiable. Lol. I made all these participations while lectures were ongoing. I know you would care to know how it was balancing these extra curricular activities with my class lectures and academics. It has not been so easy thus far balancing it out but i cannot rule out the place of passion. Before I took up the mantle, I was ready for everything it would take and was ready to ensure my academics does not suffer from my keen participation. And anywhere issue arises, I was always prepared to correct the anomaly – everything banks on readiness, if there is a will, there must be a way.
My greatest participation in Moot and Mock Competitions took place during the prolonged strike. Before I committed myself to further participation in this competition, I decided to intern in a leading litigation firm in my state where I was further exposed to rules of court, drafting of court processes, court languages, considerable appreciation of court procedures, development of legal research skills and so much more. After learning a significant amount of all these, I rounded off my internship and travelled down to my school for preparation for national competitions. I proceeded for my first national competition in Delta State alongside one of my senior colleagues where we were listed among the schools with the best court appearances and we were therefore awarded plaques, laurels and cash prizes which we took down to our faculty. I represented the faculty in more national competitions before the strike ended and it all ended in good notes with great recognition of the oratory skills I and my teammates displayed.
While you would right now feel I have done much, I was yet unsatisfied that I have done little and there was still much to learn. It imperative to state that my participation in national competitions got me exposed to many other new things as regards advocacy (moot and mock competitions), competing with other brilliant and sharp brains from other schools really got me exposed. I made connections with these students, learn from them also and now we all still keep contacts, or even, we are more of close friends now. We share daily tips of more principles of advocacy and discuss career plans. The exposure has been great and really helpful.
During the days I had intensive learning about what advocacy entails, I decided to watch YouTube videos of moot appearances of law students from different parts of the world. I was intrigued by the level the oratory and drafting skills have taken some students to or out rightly how far they had gone, traveling to top countries across the world for participation in moot competitions. I believed this rare feat can be achieved only if I keep learning and practicing. Thus, early this year, I decided to participate or show interest in an international law moot competition. It is the most prestigious and biggest moot court competition for law students across the world – The Philip Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition. I was at first reluctant to participate reasons being that I was still in my third year and was yet to offer international law. However, I had to abandon my worries because after all, the moot competitions I have all participated in, the subject matter of the facts have most time been on areas of law I have not been lectured on. They are things I always have to study myself.
As a result of this, I started drafting my arguments and practicing for the Jessup Competition. I represented my school alongside a senior colleague in the competition. We are paired against top schools in Nigeria from the preliminary rounds to the semi finals and finals of the competition. We made it to the finals of the competition and during the Judges’ pronouncement (after the round), we were announced as the winner of the competition having beaten our opponent with over 20 marks gap. We were thereafter informed that our victory has earned us a pride of place and a rare feat to represent our country in the international round of the competition in Washington D.C, United States of America where we will be competing with top schools from all over the world. It sounded surreal to me. I was finding it hard to put my thoughts right, align my reasoning and bring myself out of sudden shock the information subjected me to. Immediately, I created in my head a picture of what my traveling to the United States could look like. I found myself in-between myriads of thoughts; did I just make it to travel out to the United States? Of all countries, why United States? Will I really be getting the most reputable United States Visa? These thoughts and more left me puzzled that till now I cannot explain rightly how I felt when the information came.
With the necessary supports from my school, in the month of April, I and my teammates made our way to the United States. Unbelievable right? (It is still a moment that would take a full day or more to share). I was thus made to represent my school and my country at large in the United States in the international round of the Philip Jessup Competition. My team and I competed with other brilliant minds from top schools in the world; Harvard University, Oxford, Cambridge, Yale, Columbia law school, King’s College, Amsterdam University etc (over 138 schools in the world). The competition was really intense with great exposure to many things, connections with sharp and brilliant minds (law students) and with distinguished and top legal professionals in the world, with reputable law firms legal experts like White and Case LLP lawyers, among others.
Resoundingly, you would by now feel I have achieved much more than before. However, i still feel this is little and will not stop learning. I think this just open the floodgate to look into the bigger picture of what hard work and consistency can bring. Thus, since I am human – quite insatiable, I will not stop learning and practicing. This is beginning of another chapter!
The benefits of participating in moot competitions is numerous and not exhaustive. The more you participate in competitions, the more you figure out the benefits that accrues to you via your participation.
Foremost, participating in advocacy competitions builds your confidence and sharpen your oratory skills. It kills your stage fright. Ordinarily, there is hardly a place, podium, or even before a large crowd that you would not be able to speak. This participation would make you have a full control of any stage as if the world is your oyster.
Also, the participation will expose you to different areas of the legal profession aside what you are being taught within the four walls of your classroom. It even makes you see in practice the theoretical principles you are being taught in class.
Furthermore, the experience you get from moot activities do go a long way in smoothing your paths most especially when you are trying to find a niche for yourself in the legal profession to specialize in. You just cannot tell where you would get to (with moot activity) that would cause a huge impact or contribute immensely to your knowledge of law or general knowledge about the legal profession.
In addition, moot and mock competitions is the best extracurricular activity a law student can engage himself or herself in. In fact, I out rightly believe that moot and mock competitions should not be best regarded as ‘extracurricular activity’. This is because moot and mock activities have its way of contributing to academic performance in class – you just have to be smart and know when to apply some things.
Having said all these, it is imperative for me to reiterate that my experience thus far as a moot and mock enthusiast has been an interesting, educating and a worthwhile venture. And that the benefits that accrues from participation is expansive, limitless and awesome.
Written by Oluboyo Taiwo LLB (in view)
MY EXPERIENCE I began my advocacy journey while in my first year with participation in webinars, workshops and seminars on learning the rudiments of advocacy and what it takes for one to thrive in it. Basically, as at then, I had keen interest in Litigation (even till now, my interest is not as intense as it used to be. Lol).
The Police are not debt collectors and have no business with resolving civil disputes. In our previous article on whether you can be arrested for owing a debt/loan app or Bank, we made it clear that the Police are not debt collectors. The duties of the Police under the Police Act do not include the collection of debts or even the settlement of civil disputes.
Also, don’t forget, it is not a crime to be in debt in Nigeria. There is no law that makes the owing of loans or debts a criminal offence. At best, owing a loan and not paying it back would constitute a civil dispute. And remember, the Police have no business in settling civil disputes. That business is for the Courts. Just to be clear, civil disputes also include – family crisis, land ownership tussles etc.
Should you use the Police to haunt your debtors under the guise that they have defrauded you, you could be courting trouble for yourself. What we fully mean is that you could and would be liable for any fundamental rights infringement the Police carry out on your debtor due to your petition to them (the Police). In the words of the Court of Appeal; “The position is and has always been that the private individual who uses the police to settle a private score, would himself be liable for the wrongful act of the police.”. See more HERE
Also, the police themselves have a duty to sift through petitions presented to them to tell indeed if a truly criminal element exists that is worthy of the exercise of their powers.
Our Authorities are –
Section 4 of the Police Act 2020
NWADIUGWU v. IGP & ORS(2015) LPELR-26027(CA)
CP.,ONDO STATE & ORS v. KILADEJO (2020) LPELR-52286(CA)
EZEIGBO v. IKECHUKWU & ORS (2019) LPELR-48445(CA)
Nkpa v Nkume (2001) 6 NWLR Pt. 710 at Pg. 543
The Police are not debt collectors and have no business with resolving civil disputes. In our previous article on whether you can be arrested for owing a debt/loan app or Bank, we made it clear that the Police are not debt collectors. The duties of the Police under the Police Act do not include the collection of debts or even the settlement of
The Students Loans (Access to Higher Education Act) 2023, was recently assented to by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. The Act establishes an Education Loan Fund to help Nigerians fund their higher education, while they pay in instalments two years after completing their participation in the National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) programme.
Download a copy of the Act HERE
The Students Loans (Access to Higher Education Act) 2023, was recently assented to by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. The Act establishes an Education Loan Fund to help Nigerians fund their higher education, while they pay in instalments two years after completing their participation in the National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) programme. Download a copy of the Act HERE