“The love that once bound these two people and got frosted. Can be likened to verse xxxv of Shakespeare “Sonnets a sort of Lamentation”. And also verse 1 of “Passionate Pilgrim” Thus we have in this case” so much love.  And then so much pain”. It is the way of the World.”

PATS – ACHOLONU, JSC

Fellow compatriots, heartbreaks seem to have a never-ending trend season. A few months back, news of breakups, dumping, eloping and jilting were very common. As you would expect, each ‘jilt or breakup’ episode had different story lines and plot twists but all had a common summary. That summary as you also know is this; one romantic partner refused fulfilling his or her promise to marry.

This is what one may call – ‘a very annoying I no do again situation’. And it often leaves the disappointed partner heartbroken and sometimes doing a mental cover of Toni Braxton’s un-break my heart or Adele’s someone like you. This is a sad reality, I know and you might ask; is the law silent on heartbreaks? The answer is a ‘technical’ No, the law actually offers the heart broken some succor in selected situations. The Law also affects couples when they are dating as you can remember by this previous article of ours.

To commence our explanation, it is important to know that a romantic relationship remains unrecognized or unprotected by the law until a promise of marriage is made. Once this promise is made, the status of the relationship is lifted to a legally binding contract.

What is a Promise to Marry?

A “promise to marry” is simply an agreement between two people to be married. This agreement can be made orally, in writing or otherwise. No matter how the agreement is made, it must be made with mutual understanding by both parties to each other. Note the word ‘mutual’ please. Interestingly too, in some cases, a promise to marry can be inferred from the conduct or action of the party making the promise.

Where a party calls off the engagement by any means, other than by an agreement with the other party, he/she is in breach of a promise of marriage and can be sued (put differently, he or she is liable).

But after the heart break comes this news Flash: if the heartbroken partner engages in acts of violence to hurt the eloped or jilting partner, criminal charges could come knocking. And the heart broken partner may console himself or herself in prison after being prosecuted. It is therefore advisable that a hurt partner seeks redress in court and not inflict violence on the heart breaker.

In suing for breach of promise to marry, it would be necessary to prove that:

  1. there was a promise of marriage (recognizable in Law) and this does not need to be in writing. The promise of marriage must be clear. No one should be in doubt of the real intentions of the parties into enter into a marriage. A mere romantic relationship, wishful thinking and futuristic talks won’t sustain a suit in Court.
  2. the other party has failed or refused to honour their obligation (in this case, the promise of marriage)

Once these elements are sufficiently proven, the party is entitled to and may be granted a measure of monetary compensation (damages). However, the proof of these elements is not an automatic lottery ticket to monetary compensation. That is because of Section 197 of the Evidence Act (which I have reproduced below).

Very importantly too, never forget that the Court will not force an unwilling partner into marrying a willing and ready partner. Therefore, you will not get an order from the Court forcing the ‘heartbreaker’ to fulfill his or her promise of marriage. Rather, the court will convert whatever loss suffered into monetary and material value. Such may be loss of marriage/consortium, injured feelings, wounded pride and money spent in contemplation of the promise to marry.

Other Compensations may include: 

  1. Recovery of engagement ring: where the lady breaks off the engagement without just cause, she is bound to return the ring. On the other hand, where the man breaks off the engagement without just cause, he loses his right to reclaim the ring.
  2. Recovery of Gifts: this is the most sort after compensation. Just for the records, it is noteworthy that the law makes a distinction between gifts made in contemplation of marriage on the one hand, and those that are absolute and free on the other hand. The former include the ring, money and items directly meant for the wedding day and matrimonial home. These are recoverable. While absolute and given gifts given freely out of love, and not on the ‘business’ or contract of marriage are not recoverable. Putting it more practically, all those recharge cards, hair money, sit-out expenses, valentine’s day gifts and iPhone money are irrecoverable because they were given out of love as could happen between friends, and are therefore not proof of a promise to marry.

The ‘Heartbreaker/Defendant’ may have a sufficient defence in Court if: 

  1. he or she proves that the agreement to marry was made under fraud, duress or misrepresentation.
  2. the plaintiff/heartbroken party (or Ex) possesses certain moral, physical or mental infirmity or incapacities which makes he or she unfit for marriage. Some instances here include: bad character, violence and ungovernable temper, lady is pregnant for another man, or where the plaintiff had an illegitimate child without the knowledge of the defendant before the agreement was made.

On the whole, the law frowns on heartbreaks after there has been a promise of marriage. Also in appropriate cases, the law provides monetary compensation to the heartbroken when there is an unfulfilled promise of marriage.

Next time you or someone you know suffers a breach of promise to marry, please do not try to physically harm anybody. Get mad by consulting a lawyer!

Sources:

MISS CHINYE A.M. EZEANAH V. ALHAJI MAHMOUD I. ATTA (2004) LPELR-1198(SC)

Lambe v. Jolayemi (2002) 13 NWLR (Pt. 784) Pg. 356 Paras. E – G

Section 197 of the Evidence Act 2011 states that No Plaintiff in any action for breach of promise of marriage can recover a verdict unless his or her testimony is corroborated by some other material evidence in support of such promise, and the fact that the defendant did not answer letters affirming that he had promised to marry the Plaintiff is not such corroboration.

You may also want to read this article by Alliance Law Firm

Aniekan Imeh LLB

The information above is only provided for general information purposes and does not amount to legal advice or soliciting. Also, No Lawyer-client relationship has been created and neither can such a relationship be implied. This information is not intended to substitute the services of a lawyer, if you need legal advice, kindly consult a lawyer for your specific needs. For any further information, you could send us a mail via contact@ls-ng.com.

“The love that once bound these two people and got frosted. Can be likened to verse xxxv of Shakespeare “Sonnets a sort of Lamentation”. And also verse 1 of “Passionate Pilgrim” Thus we have in this case” so much love.  And then so much pain”. It is the way of the World.” PATS – ACHOLONU, JSC Fellow compatriots, heartbreaks seem to have a

A few months back, the trending lyrics were; “valentine is coming, where is your boyfriend…”. At the time of this writing, valentine has passed and we must admit for most cases, labor room manifestations may have shown up 8 months later. 

I admit that falling in love may sometimes seem like some tricky business. The law seems to identify this too. Thus, the law does not give you substantial regulations on when to “shoot your shot”, who to “chyke” as well as the hot strike or toasting lines that you must use on a prospective boo. The major restrictions by Nigerian Law on who you could think of entering into a marriage relationship with are; 

  1. You cannot marry a minor or child that is a person below 18 years1
  2. You cannot marry a person of the same sex or gender 2
  3. You cannot marry within the prohibited degrees of consanguinity3. If you and your intended spouse, are within the prohibited degree of affinity you can only lawfully get married after applying to a Judge for permission to do so4. Sounds strange right? I know.

Just to explain further, the prohibited degrees of consanguinity and affinity are actually classes of relationships either by marriage or blood which render it unlawful for two persons to get married. Blood relationships are called consanguinity and marriage relationships are called affinity. By the law, the prohibited degrees of consanguinity include – a blood Sister or brother, Uncles, Aunties, Nephews, and Nieces. So as a man or woman, the law prohibits your getting married to any of the persons on that list (the consanguinity list).

For the affinity list (or the prohibited degrees of affinity) here we go; your mother-in-law, your wife’s grandmother, stepdaughter or son, Step Mom or Dad. Don’t ask why anyone would want to get married to someone on this list.

  1. You cannot marry a person who is already lawfully married to another person under the Marriage Act. This is called the offense of bigamy. Interestingly, it is important to know that Lagos State has decriminalized bigamy. Hurray? There are still some arguments about this in some law circles.

Before I continue, pls note: in this article, we use bae and boo as conventional slang terms for girlfriend or boyfriend. 

In continuation, don’t forget that the law in this realm is rather protective of boo’s interest and so, doing the work of ‘Johnny’ in Yemi Alade’s hit song may just land you a lawsuit. Put differently; don’t follow Cynthia, don’t give Uche belle, and don’t promise Nene marriage when you don’t intend to marry Nene. If you do, Nene can sue you for breach of promise to marry and may get monetary compensation for your toiling with her heart. This is because, under Nigerian law, an agreement to marry is seen as a binding legal contract. It is however important to note that the Court will not force an unwilling party into getting married to a boo that he or she now considers an ex-boo. 

Having said the above, here are some specific things to note;

What if I physically abuse my Partner while dating?

It is common to overhear shouts from most couples in a dating relationship. Scratch that. Let us get a bit more specific; in most dating relationships, it is common to hear “You will kill me today” from the lady while the man pounds at her as if he is another heavyweight boxer (it could be the reverse mind you). Note that, being in a relationship does not give you the right to physically abuse your partner.

Doing this may make you guilty of criminal assault and make you enjoy the solitary confines of a jail cell5

In Lagos State, there is also the Protection Against Domestic Violence Law of 2007 that prohibits all forms of domestic violence. Also, an abused partner could maintain or file a civil action and if successful may be given (or awarded) monetary compensation by the Court. 

Does My Girlfriend or Boyfriend Legally Owe me Sex?

As a boyfriend, your boo does not legally owe you any duty to satisfy your sexual demands (consortium). This duty is only legally owed by validly married couples to each other. Also, don’t forget that having sex with your girlfriend where she is below 18 is a criminal offense6 

Put differently, if by any strange occurrence, your boo is below 18 and you are caught having sexual intercourse (even when it is with her consent) you will be prosecuted for having committed an offense. This is because since boo is less than 18 years, she has not reached ‘the age of consent’. The age of consent in Nigeria is 18 years old. The ‘age of consent’ is the minimum age at which an individual is considered legally old enough to consent (or agree) to participate in sexual activity.

Where boo is above 18 but withholds consent and you forcefully carry out sexual activity with her, it is termed rape and this is also punishable by law. It is also important to say that Men can now also be raped by women under Nigerian Law. This position of the law does not apply throughout Nigeria and you could find out why in this previous article of ours.  

Can I sue My darling for gifts and unfulfilled promises?

Strange as it may sound, Boo is not “legally bound” to give you a birthday gift, valentine’s day gift, women’s day money, Friday evening money, hair money, shoe money, etc. As a general rule, whatever your partners gives you or fails to give you cannot be adjudicated upon. This is because the law presupposes that your partner didn’t make the promise or give the gift with the intention of being sued where he/she fails. Whatever material benefit you enjoy is solely at the romantic discretion of your partner. Don’t tell Boo I told you. This doesn’t mean that people dating cannot enter into a valid contract. One exception to this general rule is the promise to get married (or promise of marriage). This is one promise that can lead to a lawsuit if broken. You can equally confirm this through this article of ours.  

Remember Also:

Under Nigerian law, where adult you have lived with your adult girlfriend as man and wife for a reasonable length of time, there’s the rebuttable presumption of marriage. This means that the law presumes that you’re presumed married until otherwise proven.

Nkobowo Frederick BL 

The information above is only provided for general information purposes and does not amount to legal advice or soliciting. Also, No Lawyer-client relationship has been created, and neither can such a relationship be implied. This information is not intended to substitute the services of a lawyer, if you need legal advice, kindly consult a lawyer for your specific needs. For any further information, you could send us a mail via contact@ls-ng.com

CITATIONS

  1. Sections 21, 22, and 23 of the Childs Rights Act 2003
  2. Sections 1 and 2 of the Same-Sex (Prohibition) Act 2013
  3. Citation – Section 3 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1970
  4. Section 4 of the Matrimonial Causes Act
  5. Section 252 of the Criminal Code Act, Section 170 of the Criminal Code Law of Lagos State
  6. Sections 221 and 357 of the Criminal Code Act, Section 31 of the Child’s Right Act 2003
  7. the Violence Against Persons (Prohibition) Act, the Criminal Code Act, the Penal Code

A few months back, the trending lyrics were; “valentine is coming, where is your boyfriend…”. At the time of this writing, valentine has passed and we must admit for most cases, labor room manifestations may have shown up 8 months later.  I admit that falling in love may sometimes seem like some tricky business. The law seems to identify this

Sometimes, getting legal services may require that you have enough money to pay the professional fees that would be charged by a lawyer. In most cases, this can be demanding because it is not common to find Nigerians who save money in preparation for ‘legal trouble’. At other times, the professional fees charged by your preferred lawyer maybe well above your current financial means and therefore difficult for you to pay.

Organizations that offer free Legal Services In Nigeria

Do not worry, there are organizations that offer free legal services to Nigerians who would otherwise not have access to legal help or services.

These organizations include;

LEDAP (Legal Defence and Assistance Project)

LEDAP is a non-governmental organization (NGO) comprising of Lawyers and law professionals. The primary aim of LEDAP is to promote and protect human rights, rule of law and good governance in Nigeria. The organization majors in providing free legal services to poor Nigerians who are victims of human rights abuses, women who are victims of domestic violence amongst others.  

You can visit their website at http://ledapnigeria.org/ or send them an email via info@ledapnigeria.org. You could equally follow their facebook page at  https://www.facebook.com/ledap.nigeria

and twitter handle @ledapnigeria to keep up with their activities and reach out to them.

LEDAP currently has offices in Lagos, Abuja, Port Harcourt and Osogbo. Some contact phone numbers for the organization are +234 9 290 1589, 0813 846 0703 (Abuja office), +234 803 302 4914 (Port Harcourt office), +234 1 291 4123, 08036913264 (general phone lines), 07030000014 (toll free number).

Legal Aid Council, Nigeria

The Legal Aid Council, Nigeria (LAC) is a governmental body established by the Legal Aid Act of 2011. The LAC provides legal services in selected criminal cases and civil cases.

The criminal cases the LAC provides legal representation for include stealing, rape, armed robbery, murder, common assault etc. The civil cases include; fundamental rights enforcement cases, a case filed by an employee for compensation for injury or accident suffered during his employment etc (for the complete list of services offered by the LAC see the Second Schedule of the Legal Aid Act 2011)

You can visit the LAC’s website at https://legalaidcouncil.gov.ng/  For correspondences, you could send an email to the LAC via info@legalaidcouncil.gov.ng

FIDA Nigeria

FIDA Nigeria is a Non-Governmental Organization that focuses on protecting women and children’s rights in Nigeria. It provides free legal services to poor or indigent women and children as well as counselling services. Currently FIDA has branches in 32 states of the Federation including the FCT.

To reach FIDA Nigeria, you can visit their website at https://fida.org.ng/ or send an email to fidanigeria@yahoo.com or call +234 708 849 6115 for inquiries.

You can equally reach out to the organization through its Facebook page. To access the services of FIDA Nigeria, you could also choose to fill a complaint form via this link https://fida.org.ng/how-to-access-our-services/

Apart from the organizations listed above, these organizations in the list below equally offer free legal services. For ease, their contact details include;

Office of the Public Defender, Lagos state

Contact Information

Head Office: – 2/8, Iyun Road, Stadium/Barrack Busstop by Funsho Williams Avenue, Surulere, Lagos.

Ikorodu Office: The Combined High/Magistrate Court, Ita-Elewa, Ikorodu Lagos.

Ogba Office: Samuel Ilori Court, Ogba, Agege, Lagos

Epe Offie: Ligali Ayorinde Combined Magistrate/HighCourt Complex, Epe, Lagos

Toll Free: 070 80 60 10 80

Email: opdlagos@yahoo.com, opdlagos@facebook.com Twitter: @opdlagos

Care for Legal Assistance and Human Rights Protection

Abuja, Nigeria

Contact Information

+2347061016859, +2347050413395

clahrpnigeria@gmail.com

Probono Clearing House

(An Initiative of the Justice Research Institute Ltd. Gte)

Contact Information

Abuja: No. 817B (Twin House) Behind GT Bank, Off EbituUkiwe Street, Jabi, Abuja FCT

Lagos: 4a Ademola Street, South West Ikoyi, Ikoyi, Lagos State.

Telephone: +234 8148922270

Email: support@probono.ng Website: https://www.probono.ng/

Women’s Rights Advancement and Protection Alternative (WRAPA)

Contact Information

19, Monrovia Street, Off Aminu Kano Way, Wuse II, Abuja

Phone :08188699961, 08172125692, 07063807887

Email:Wrapa399@gmail.com, wrapa399@yahoo.com

Justice Development and Peace Center (JDPC) of the Catholic Secretariat of Nigeria

Contact Information

Lagos: 19, Maye Street, Yaba, Lagos jdpcarchlag@yahoo.co.uk, +(234)8102580516

Ibadan: http://www.jdpcibadan.org/, Inside St. Patrick’s Catholic Church Compound, Bashorun, Ibadan, Nigeria, jdpcibd@gmail.com, +234 (2) 7519315

Sokoto: https://catholicdiocese-sokoto.org/jdpc, Catholic Diocese of Sokoto, St. Bakhita Secretariat, No 1 Aliyu Jodi Road, +234(0) 8060934550, admin@catholicdiocese-sokoto.org

Abuja: https://jdpcabuja.org.ng/, Flat 1, Block 6, No 2, Oba Close Off Mokwa Street, Off Bendel Street, Area 2, FCT Abuja, jdpcabuja@yahoo.com, +234 807609825, +234 8038765410

Pro bono Services by Lawyers

It is also worthy of note that most lawyers offer free legal services (also called pro-bono services) to indigent persons out of their own volition or free will. These services are usually provided by lawyers without anticipation of financial remuneration or payment of legal fees. To help further, we started the LAWgically Speaking Blog to offer free legal information for every Nigerian.


The information above is only provided for general information purposes and does not amount to legal advice or soliciting. Also, No Lawyer-client relationship has been created and neither can such a relationship be implied. This information is not intended to substitute the services of a lawyer, if you need legal advice, kindly consult a lawyer for your specific needs. For any further information, you could send us a mail via contact@ls-ng.com.

Sometimes, getting legal services may require that you have enough money to pay the professional fees that would be charged by a lawyer. In most cases, this can be demanding because it is not common to find Nigerians who save money in preparation for ‘legal trouble’. At other times, the professional fees charged by your preferred lawyer maybe well above

As a young child, were you ever caught by your Dad with a hot piece of meat? Like, caught ‘red-handed’. Right before you could toss the attractive piece of meat into your mouth and say nothing happened?

Or maybe Dad never caught or saw you but little Sis always did and threatened to tell Dad what she caught you doing. Now, did it happen that Daddy never allowed you to explain what you were really doing since little sis “caught” you red-handed and He often began to flog the living heaven into you?

But wait a minute, it could have been that you had a proper explanation for why you were caught in the ‘compromising situation’

  • For instance, WHAT IF you were only returning the meat to the pot, and not removing that meat found in your hand?
  • WHAT IF big brother had forgotten to give you meat and asked you to go and remove a piece of meat from the pot?

When Little Sis told on you, Daddy may not have had the patience to listen to your proper explanation before handing down the cane treatment (a.k.a flogging). Unlike Dad, the law actually considers things differently. So, the law places a duty on a Judge to exercise patience enough to listen to that explanation of yours. In fact, the law gives you a right to make your explanation. This is where your right to fair hearing comes in!

So for the records, remember that even with a lump of stolen meat in hand, the law gives you a right to a fair hearing. We will explain how it all fits in.

Why Fair Hearing is Important [We do not own the copyrights to this image]

What Does the Right to Fair Hearing Basically Mean?

The right to Fair hearing is a Constitutional right granted to everyone who goes before or is brought before a court or an administrative tribunal. Section 36 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria contains the relevant provisions for the right to fair hearing.

The Two Pillars of the Right to Fair Hearing

The right to fair hearing has two major ambits, parts or pillars.

The first pillar of the right is that ‘both parties must be heard’. In Latin we say it this way; ‘Audi Alteram partem’ which means – hear the other side.

Usually, there are two sides to every case or dispute. These sides are what we have just called ‘parties’. Therefore in our illustration, Little Sis (the accuser) is a party and you (the accused pot opener) are ‘another’ party while Dad is certainly the Judge.

This pillar of your right to fair hearing implies that you as well as your opponent or accuser should be given equal opportunity to present your respective cases. Also, each party is entitled to know what are the allegations being made against him or her and be allowed to be heard before a verdict (or judgment) is given. A Judge is therefore at all times expected to allow both parties to present their cases and should listen to the case of each party.

Applying this to our illustration, it simply means that Dad is to allow you and little sis to explain what happened before he decides to punish or applaud you.

A Justice of the Supreme Court once explained it this way; “It is the duty of anyone in control of proceedings to allow both parties to be heard and should listen to the point of view of each. Even God saw Adam eat the forbidden fruit which he warned him never to eat but the Lord still gave Adam a fair hearing when the Lord asked “Did you eat the fruit I told you not to eat”? See Genesis 3:11. It was after Adam was unable to give a satisfactory answer that punishment followed. That was the beginning of fair hearing.”; JUDICIAL SERVICE COMMISSION OF CROSS RIVER STATE & ANOR. v. YOUNG (2013) LPELR-20592(SC)

Let us emphasize also here that as a part of the right to fair hearing, when anyone is accused of committing a crime and charged to court, by Section 36(5) of the 1999 Nigerian constitution that person is presumed to be innocent until his or her guilt is proven. This is why even persons accused of the most heinous crimes are allowed to defend themselves in court either by themselves or through a lawyer of their choice.

Got the picture right?

The second pillar of the right to fair hearing is “a person should not be a judge in his own cause”. There is a Latin phrase for this too – ‘Nemo Judex in causa sua’. This pillar really implies that no judge should preside over a matter in which he has a personal interest or involvement. Every judge is to be an independent umpire or referee called upon to settle the dispute without bias or even the likelihood of bias. Anyone can only imagine or expect that if the judge was even ‘remotely’ interested in the result of the dispute or case, he would not be fair in his judgment.

In summary, both pillars of the right to fair hearing are mainly to the effect that; no person shall be a judge in his own cause and that both sides to a dispute have an equal opportunity to present their case.

A Short Graphical Illustration of the Right to Fair Hearing

The graphical illustration in this article is meant strictly for explanation purposes. Kindly swipe to view them.

How Does Your Right to Fair Hearing Play out in Court?

  1. You must be informed of the case against you and given adequate opportunity to prepare for your defense;
  2. All important materials of evidence, including documentary and ‘real’ evidence unfavorable to you (and which your accuser intends to use) are to be given to you to enable you to prepare your defense;
  3. You’re to be present during the Proceedings and hear the evidence against you. There are actually instances where the proceedings may continue if you knowingly and persistently absent yourself from Court.
  4. You are to be allowed to cross-examine all the witnesses that testify against you. Cross-examination simply means asking the witnesses some questions in other to challenge their evidence. Where you are represented by a lawyer, he or she would carry out the cross-examination;
  5. You are allowed to give evidence for yourself, call witnesses, if you choose to, and make oral submissions, whether personally or through a lawyer of your choice.

If you do not have the necessary financial resources to get the services of a lawyer, there are organizations that offer free legal services. You could find out about them and get their contact details here.

So now you know about your right to fair hearing.

Aniekan Imeh LLB.

The information above is only provided for general information purposes and does not amount to legal advice or soliciting. Also, No Lawyer-client relationship has been created and neither can such a relationship be implied. This information is not intended to substitute the services of a lawyer, if you need legal advice, kindly consult a lawyer for your specific needs. For any further information, you could send us a mail via contact@ls-ng.com

As a young child, were you ever caught by your Dad with a hot piece of meat? Like, caught ‘red-handed’. Right before you could toss the attractive piece of meat into your mouth and say nothing happened? Or maybe Dad never caught or saw you but little Sis always did and threatened to tell Dad what she caught you doing.

In the wake of the widespread #EndSars protests by the Nigerian youths against the brutality and killings by men of the Special Anti- Robbery Squad (SARS), it has become necessary to address the issue as to whether the protesters do have the right to protest under the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) and other legal frameworks.

By the combined effect of Sections 39 and 40 of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution, every Nigerian citizen has the right to protest as a way of either voicing out his or her opinions on a particular subject matter or expressing displeasure at the policies of the government or simply demanding for his or her rights. This right to protest is however not plainly stated as “the right to protest”. The right is captured in the wordings of sections 39 and 40 0f the 1999 Constitution (as amended). Section 39 provides for the right to freedom of expression which covers the freedom to hold opinions and being able to express same. Subsection 2 of that section particularly allows an individual to adopt any medium for the dissemination of ideas and opinions. It can therefore be inferred and indeed the courts in Nigeria have done so, that protest is a medium of conveying ideas and opinions. Section 40 of the Constitution allows for persons to form peaceful assemblies and associations for the protection of their interests. Therefore, when people gather to peacefully protest for a good cause, their right to do so is protected by this provision. By demonstrating through rallies and carrying of placards, the protesters are simply exercising their constitutional rights.

|One Scenery during the #EndSars Protest | Photo Credit Photo by Ayanfe Olarinde on Unsplash

A look at some International legislations which Nigeria has ratified (that is, signed up to obey), shows that the right to peaceful assembly which covers the right to protest is a human right. Article 11 of the African Charter on Peoples’ Rights (Cap A9), Laws of the Federation of Nigeria and Article 21 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), 1966, provide for this.

International law places a duty on the government and its law enforcement agents to provide the enabling environment for the enjoyment of this right to protest. The law enforcement agents in maintaining peace and security during protests are to comply with the provisions of the 1990 United Nations Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials. For instance, in trying to dispel protesters who have become violent, the force to be use by the law enforcement officer example; the police must be for a legitimate law enforcement purpose and must be proportionate to the level of violence displayed by the protesters. That is to say that the law actually allows for the police or any other law enforcement officer to use some level of force against a ‘specific individual’ where there is a threat of death or serious danger. What is important is that the force used should be directly proportional to the level of violence. Accordingly, the police cannot fire shots randomly at protesters who are merely throwing packs of sachet water at them.

It is of importance that protesters be aware that as they carry on with the protests, the law places a duty on them to conduct themselves peacefully and not resort to rampage or any form of violence. If they do so, they will be in breach of certain provisions of the criminal code and maybe liable to be prosecuted. They are also to be aware of the rights of other citizens and not use the protests to violate the rights of others.

In the end, we pray and hope for a sane and better Nigeria where all of our rights will matter and will be protected.

Queen Ukpo BL

The information above is only provided for general information purposes and does not amount to legal advice or soliciting. Also, No Lawyer-client relationship has been created and neither can such a relationship be implied. This information is not intended to substitute the services of a lawyer, if you need legal advice, kindly consult a lawyer for your specific needs. For any further information, you could send us a mail via contact@ls-ng.com

In the wake of the widespread #EndSars protests by the Nigerian youths against the brutality and killings by men of the Special Anti- Robbery Squad (SARS), it has become necessary to address the issue as to whether the protesters do have the right to protest under the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) and other legal

Thank goodness our first appearance is off the table. We are however still grinding our legal teeth – the litigation pair that is.

But there is that strain. The slight inconvenience of being a ‘junior’ Counsel in Court and with another junior appearing for the adverse party. You arrive Court before 9am, take a seat where your shiny new wig would permit. Then you search for your matter on the cause list. This is not the Federal High Court or the Court of Appeal. Not at all. For those, you would have a senior leading your humble learned self. This is the State High Court and you are the junior whose matter has been listed as number 22 on a cause list of 22 matters.

You know the feeling. It’s like coming last in class. Or maybe not, since you reason you could negotiate your position forward by seeking the kind permission of your learned seniors in Court. You seek that kind permission. Very humbly you ask. But sometimes that kind permission is unkindly withheld. You frown. Clearly another day of yours has been involuntarily assigned to you sitting through till the Court rises. Just like it happened last week, and the other before.

The wait for all seniors present to finish prosecuting their cases so you get to ‘indicate your interest’ in number 22 on My Lord’s cause-list can be distressing. But within that period, just like within every other period during our professional career; you and I can do two things by simple and careful observation –

We can learn ‘how to’. And We can learn ‘how not to’.

In effect we can learn – How to approach matters before a particular Judge, how to deal with various issues that may arise in the course of arguing a contentious application, how a particular principle of law is applied to a set of facts etc.

So if we see an issue excellently handled or successfully navigated– that is ‘how to’. When we can, it can be advised that you replicate same.

If we see an issue improperly handled and thus necessitating a stern rebuke from the bench (in some cases) – that is how not to. When tempted to do same, it is advised that we kindly call on all celestial forces we know to help us overcome such an urge.

Even in chambers these two learning pathways in my respectful view are always open. How to and how not to. We can choose either at any relevant time.

Litigation Notes are a series of short courtroom and practice lessons gleaned from the personal practice journal that chronicles the green wig years of Frederick Nkobowo Esq. They represent his considered and respectful opinion which could change as his age at the bar inevitably progresses. It is respectfully hoped that these notes would proffer some aid to other practitioners even as the writer looks to gathering more learning. He practices in Delta State and can be reached via fredericknkobowo@gmail.com

Thank goodness our first appearance is off the table. We are however still grinding our legal teeth – the litigation pair that is. But there is that strain. The slight inconvenience of being a ‘junior’ Counsel in Court and with another junior appearing for the adverse party. You arrive Court before 9am, take a seat where your shiny new wig

Dictionary Definition – a room where a law court meets.

Generally Accepted ‘Actual’ definition for many Green Wigs – The room our stomachs rumble in, our palms sweat in and our feet get jelly in, all on our first day of litigation practice.

Let us revisit the scenery.

It is our first day of Court work after the glorious call to the Nigerian Bar. Before this day, Law school was either extreme fun, especially rewarding, grievously annoying, particularly disappointing or just some long period of avoidable human stress. Anyways, the situation is over and behold, we have become lawyers, called to the largest Bar in Africa, licensed to help all juristic persons get properly sued in any Court and having possession of a wig and gown itching for some court room action in the fashion of Harvey Specter from Suits or Alan Shore from Boston Legal.

So on this first day of real life after call to bar, we wake up, dust up that sleek call to bar suit – the one still reeking of all the goodwill and head inflating compliments from the day of call. We put it on and off we are to work.

It is common knowledge that not every young lawyer gets into the Ivy League law firms in Nigeria. But we trained 6 years for legal practice, so in any event, we still get to a law firm as available. For a number of these firms, the first day or even weeks at work (especially when you are an NYSC Associate) may involve taking innocuous motions, applying for adjournments, carrying files to accompany seniors and recording proceedings in various Courts. I say this because I’ve obviously had a small share of it and in some respect I agree that they are part of the learning process (I will explain my take on this in a subsequent note).

So back to where we left off – our first day of Court work. That first glorious appearance in Court stares us in the face. Whatever day of the week it is really doesn’t matter. The internal battles that precede it most times overwhelm all that. So that many times, that first appearance in Court requires the internal summoning of all the ancestors that did not send us to read this law.

Our wig and gown stand up with us to address the Court but when it’s time to talk, we discover our village people may have arrived and are standing with us too.

I remember my first appearance at the High Court of Edo State sitting in Benin. I was to appear before His Lordship Hon. Justice A. Edodo Eruaga (Now Rtd), the day was sunny but that was not my problem. I feared that my tongue would somehow not work once my Lord stared at me. Something even told me my legs might give way under me. And my stomach? The 4th world war was already happening there. I was just frankly scared. And what caused all these exactly? In my heart of hearts I could not tell. My purpose that morning? Simply tell the Court that we could not ensure service of our processes on the Defendant and therefore we were applying for an adjournment. Anyways, to the glory of God and the shame of the devil, I returned with the next adjourned date.

The point is; for a number of new wigs, the first appearance would be fear laden. Though I agree this fear is one that could have been dealt with in advance before that day in Court. That is why moot Court sessions, debate competitions and even speaking clubs like toast masters exist. This fear is simply the fear of public speaking in a regulated environment (in this case – the Court room). And it can be duly surmounted.

Even with that fear, proceed. Do it scared. Do it and even when you make mistakes, have the boldness and courage to learn. Besides remember that all the fidgeting going on under your wig and gown are generally not visible to onlookers in the Court room. Most times these onlookers are staring and hoping. Hoping that you get it right. Join your hope with theirs.

That is why you may get a lot of guidance from seniors when you’re on your feet addressing the Court and it looks like your heading into an oncoming judicial traffic of trouble e.g. costs or a stern rebuke from the bench.

Most times, you start scared and while still on your feet, all elements of the fear dissipate. I think that is a good sign.

Furthermore, with continued practice that fear is eventually lost. For some persons that is. For others, there is still a healthy fear when prosecuting matters in Court. In either case, a key thing to note is that mastery eliminates or subdues fear.

Mastery of the substantive law and procedure.

Mastery of the facts.

Mastery of fundamental presentation skills as well.

You can garner these while in School. But it’s not too late to garner them when already in practice.

Cheers. And to the newest wigs coming on board this July (2021), Welcome to the Bar.

Warm Regards

Litigation Notes are a series of short courtroom and practice lessons gleaned from the personal practice journal that chronicles the green wig years of Frederick Nkobowo Esq. They represent his considered and respectful opinion which could change as his age at the bar inevitably progresses. It is respectfully hoped that these notes would proffer some aid to other practitioners even as the writer looks to gathering more learning. He practices in Delta State and can be reached via fredericknkobowo@gmail.com,

Dictionary Definition – a room where a law court meets. Generally Accepted ‘Actual’ definition for many Green Wigs – The room our stomachs rumble in, our palms sweat in and our feet get jelly in, all on our first day of litigation practice. Let us revisit the scenery. It is our first day of Court work after the glorious call

Dearest Colleague,

My unadulterated botanical name is Nkobowo Frederick Nkobowo; currently a Barrister and Solicitor of the Supreme Court of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Pardon the full unveiling of my appellation or title. I was called to the Nigerian Bar a number of years ago (which is at the time of this writing is not long enough for me to apply for silk). However, my sphere of practice so far has majored on dispute resolution and as one given to occasionally spilling ink on paper, it was not unnatural that my hands would itch to write on the subject.

When I started out practice, I sought for materials that could guide my very green wig; written materials that is. After all, it was presumed that Law school and my University had taught me all the substantive and procedural law I needed to know (to at least start). But the sections and rules aside, I needed some meat and tales from practice. I love stories (not gossip unless…) and so I sought for books by great legal luminaries chronicling their headaches in court and how they overcame them. I found a few foreign books; like Alan Dershowtiz’ letters to a young lawyer (I could not buy the book but found just its preface to read) and very few others written by our own Luminaries such as; Yemi Osinbajo’s master piece on cross examination and Hints on legal practice by Anthony Ekundayo. These books were absolutely helpful and I never resist or overcome the urge to recommend them to any practitioner. I also found back then (even before reading law) initiatives like dtalkshop.com (takaii), dairy of a baby lawyer (featured in thisday lawyer) and threelegals.com; these initiatives urged my short self so strongly back then.

Now some very few years along this road of legal practice, the inspiration came to write a few notes from my own inconsistently kept personal practice journal. This has birthed ‘litigation notes’. I do not write these notes as the originator of Court room practice or as the Learned silk who rose to being a Justice of the Supreme Court. I write them as a practitioner who hopes to stir discussions on the subject and learn along the way.

So beginning with this month (July 2021), I will be publishing litigation notes. I hope to share and learn in the process.

Thank you and I do hope you enjoy this ride.

Warm Regards

Dearest Colleague, My unadulterated botanical name is Nkobowo Frederick Nkobowo; currently a Barrister and Solicitor of the Supreme Court of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Pardon the full unveiling of my appellation or title. I was called to the Nigerian Bar a number of years ago (which is at the time of this writing is not long enough for me

The year was a couple years ago. I had just returned from Court and My Senior in chambers asked a rather surprising question – “who is the judge in that Court?” I let out a few hums and then reclined my head to my fallen chest since I could not remember a name or fabricate anyone that I could get away with. Then came a foremost lesson – Know the Judex or Judge.

I have seen this same lesson replicated in other books on legal practice ever since. But more importantly, I see it play out again and again in litigation/court practice.

The Judge is the umpire with a tweeny weeny ‘but’. That ‘but’ is this: He or She is Human. I concede that the Judge is a representative of some divine ecclesiastical order. But I hold the respectful view, he is still flesh and blood and must rely on his sense of judgment, equity and fairness to decide cases before him. His years on the job give him some intuitive ability as well as some nuances. It is only wise to know more of the later and a number of the former.

And even with that knowledge, the part of mastery for the Lawyer is key.  Four masteries keep standing out to my mind – mastery of delivery, mastery of the law, mastery of the facts and mastery of emotions.

Master emotions because some days in court turn out to be worse than nagging wives or evil mother in laws.

Master Laws because they tend to change like babies in diapers. Our legislators and Judges are not dead you know? Interpretations of laws change, laws get thrown into the judicial thrash can and our law makers often get light bulbs that make them repeal and enact or amend, amend, amend.

Master delivery – master words and their use. They are the lawyer’s tool of trade. Master what to say, how to say it, when to say it and responding to the unlikely incidences that happen after you have said your bit or the other side has.

Again. On knowing the Judex, today while on my litigious sojourn to a Court whose Judge is known to waste no time on judicial razmataz, a little exchange happened. Here it is, you be the observer;

Lawyer: My Lord, the witness is in Abuja. He said he could not make it.

Judge: You are for the Claimant right? And this witness is aware of this date?

Lawyer: He is aware but the MD of their company died so he travelled…blah, blah

(Blah because the Judge had started writing while the lawyer was still reeling out his poorly rehearsed explanation, then the Court looks up)

Court: But your Client sued people to Court and this matter has been on for over 5 years. Is that not unfair? So when will be convenient for him to come from Abuja

(Lawyer honestly looks at his dairy and flips through to get a date)

Court: He is looking at his diary truly

Lawyer: a date in March would be convenient Sir

Court: Case is struck out. When he is through in Abuja, he can come back.

And so another lawyer left that Court room today, with some pruning from the Judex.

Need I Say or type more?

Written by Frederick Nkobowo BL

The year was a couple years ago. I had just returned from Court and My Senior in chambers asked a rather surprising question – “who is the judge in that Court?” I let out a few hums and then reclined my head to my fallen chest since I could not remember a name or fabricate anyone that I could get

What happens when a person dies without a will? Is there still a way of protecting his or her family’s interests in his/her assets and ensuring that family members are not cheated out or deprived of inheriting their late predecessor’s assets? First off, to commence my narration and place issues in perspective, kindly permit me to tell a short fictional story. Thank you. Permission accepted.

Chief Iwuezim OFR is a prominent titleholder in Nigeria and he is absolutely rich. In fact, simply saying that ‘Chief is rich’ is almost demeaning. The ‘length of his wealth’ is best described in these words of his native tongue- ‘Chief bu onya ego’ which is translated as – Chief is the trap of money. This native description does not encapsulate the entirety of Chief’s eminence; a board member of some prominent multinationals in the United States, owner of choice properties around the globe, business interests in many oil blocs and of course father to a community of children (both known and yet to be discovered) from his hamlet of ‘wives’, female companions and secretaries.

Rings a bell? Don’t worry, this is not a remix or retelling of the Chief DADDY movie. That is because this our dear Chief Iwuezim did not write a will before his untimely death last night[1]. Chief simply slept and has not blinked his eyelids as we speak. Now as you may have expected, the family is agog. As the news filters around town – Chief’s family, associates, and others are all gearing up.

Rita Iwuezim was the Chief’s only wife ‘within’ the house. The remaining ‘wives’ were actually the ceremonial sharers of her husband- the now late Chief Iwuezim. Rita knew these women were around though she was never had time to bother about catching them. Subconsciously, she had come to treat them as anyone would treat the secret service – you watch them in movies knowing that they surely exist somewhere but you never make it your business to look for a secret service agent as long as your life is going well. What shall Rita now do? Surely Chief’s younger brothers would be visiting with their individual sharing formulas for his properties. His previously unknown concubines will also want a portion of Chief’s wealth.

Thanks for reading my blockbuster story. I now resume my actual gist by mentioning two key points.

My first point is, you don’t want to be Chief Iwuezim by not making your will and I will explain why.

My second point is even where a will is not written or prepared, there is still a provision in the law that can safeguard the interests of your immediate family and loved ones. But for this safeguard to apply, there is one condition you must comply with (while alive). This condition will be addressed subsequently.

Before, going further into our discussion, I would love to explain some words you will meet as you read along;

When a person dies ‘testate’ – this means he made a will before he died

When a person dies ‘intestate’ – this means he died without making a will

A testator – is a person (male or female) who makes a will

Estate (as used in law) – this means all of someone’s money or property.

With those terms out of the way, I continue with my first point earlier raised –

Make your will while alive (put differently – die testate)

I know that this point should sound obvious. The truth is that many persons downplay the need to make a will. In fact, to some people, the suggestion to make a will means one is wishing them ill will or untimely death. I will kindly advise that you discard the thought if you are in either of these categories.

The truth is the advantages of making a will are so numerous that ‘not making a will’ is particularly risky. For the records, let me state very clearly that making a will is the most concrete way of protecting your assets and interests after death. This is because by making a will, you have done some ‘basic home-keeping’ and can dictate what should be carried out as your last wishes when you are no more. You also get to determine who should carry out your last wishes in the will.

In fact, to demonstrate the importance of making a will, I will borrow the words of the Supreme Court.  In Idehen v Idehen, the Court said a lot including this – ‘the Chief if not the only aim of making wills is to allow owners of property or rights to indicate how their affairs on their death could be arranged. This involves the person to whom their property could be given or those to succeed them otherwise. For instance… the testator can appoint as head of his family a person other than his eldest son, or extend the category of the beneficiaries beyond his nuclear family”

There are other advantages of making a will and we will address this in a fuller blog post.

Also, I must mention that there are still some restrictions on your ‘will-making superpower’. If I were to state that as a lawyer I would say- there are restrictions on your testamentary freedom. That really means, that in some cases, you might not be able to share all of your property using a will. For example, a person who is an adherent of the Islamic faith (in some states such as Kaduna, Oyo, Plateau, Jigawa, Kwara, and Bauchi States) cannot share his properties anyhow he desires but must comply with the tenets of Islamic law when making his will.

That said, in the unlikely event that you do not make a will after my brief TED talk above, I will go on to the second point I’ve already mentioned in passing. The point about the provision of the law that could still substantially safeguard the interest of your immediate family and loved ones where no will was made before death. For this provision of the law to apply, there is a fundamental condition that must be fulfilled which is – get married under the Marriage Act.

Get Married ‘under the Marriage Act’

Getting married under the Marriage Act is really not rocket science. To marry under the Marriage Act, the intending couple is expected to comply with the conditions provided by the law and they will be issued a certificate of marriage. To safely illustrate it, what is usually referred to as ‘Court Marriage’ is really an instance of marriage under the Marriage Act.

At this point, permit me to drop a shocker or spoiler alert. Here we go – did you know that most church weddings are not marriages under the Marriage Act? This in effect means that the protection offered by the Law to married couples does not apply to most marriages conducted in churches these days. But why is that so you ask? For a church to properly conduct a marriage under the Marriage Act, it must be a ‘licensed place of worship’ and there should be compliance with other requirements stated by the law especially Sections 7 to 17 of the Marriage Act. In practice, this is not done by most churches.

You can confirm churches that are licensed to conduct marriages in your local government area by visiting this portal created by the Ministry of Interior. https://ecitibiz.interior.gov.ng/worship/Placeofworshipsearch

Let’s proceed from our exposition above. Our focus now is – How does getting married under the Marriage Act help where someone dies without making a will. 

Where a person dies without making a will, if he was married under the Marriage Act, by operation of law, the interest of his family (especially his nuclear family) would be substantially protected. This is because his estate will be distributed according to the Administration of Estates Law and not his custom. This law provides a priority list of persons who can apply for ‘letters of administration’.

Let me give a foundational explanation at this point before I go further. Remember we mentioned earlier that when making a will you have (as the testator or maker of the will) the opportunity to appoint persons to carry on your last wishes. These persons are referred to as personal representatives. When a person dies testate, his personal representatives can easily be identified because they will be mentioned in the will and then they can take relevant steps to take control and administer the testator’s estate. Where the person dies intestate, persons who consider themselves as personal representatives are to apply for ‘letters of administration’. Until these letters of administration are granted, the law is that the deceased’s estate is ‘vested in the Court’. This means that survivors and family members of a man or woman who died without a Will have no power over his or her estate until letters of administration have been granted by the Court[2]. These letters of administration give authority to the personal representatives to take over, control, and distribute the deceased’s estate.

Like I mentioned previously, the Administration of Estates law gives a priority list of persons who are entitled to apply for letters of administration where a person dies intestate (Section 49 of the Administration of Estates Law of Lagos State).

Here is the priority list;

  1. Surviving Spouse
  1. Children of the Deceased or the issues of the children of the deceased (who died before the deceased)
  1. Parents of the deceased
  1. Brothers and sisters of the deceased of full blood and their surviving children
  1. Brothers and Sisters of the deceased of half-blood and their surviving children that are sui juris
  1. Grandparents of the deceased
  1. Uncles and Aunties of whole blood or their surviving children
  1. Creditors of the intestate estate[3]

You may ask – what effect does this list really have?

Because of the priority list, it is not any person that can or will just wake up and want to run affairs of the money or properties of a deceased person by applying to Court to given letters of administration.

A real example can be seen in the case of Obusez v Obusez; a case that got to the Supreme Court.

The long and short of what we have explained so far is –

  1. Make a will to cater to the needs of your loved ones upon your death.
  2. Where you haven’t made a will yet, ensure you are married under the Marriage Act.

Thanks for going through this long read.

Oh and kindly forgive me, I will keep you up to date with the current state of commotion at the Late Chief Iwuezim’s residence soon. In the meanwhile –

Nkobowo Nkobowo BL (Reporting)

As Usual, we have taken care to ensure the information above is correct but it is only provided for general information purposes and does not amount to legal advice or soliciting. This information is not intended to substitute the services of a lawyer, if you need legal advice, we advise that you consult your lawyer for your specific needs and peculiar circumstances. For any further information, you could send us a mail via contact@ls-ng.com

[1] In law, we would say, Chief died intestate.

[2] See the article by Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa SAN. It also makes for an interesting read on this issue- https://thenigerialawyer.com/administration-of-estates-law/.

[3] Sections 26 and 49(1) of the Administration of Estates Law of Lagos State have been the focus of this article.

Share this:

What happens when a person dies without a will? Is there still a way of protecting his or her family’s interests in his/her assets and ensuring that family members are not cheated out or deprived of inheriting their late predecessor’s assets? First off, to commence my narration and place issues in perspective, kindly permit me to tell a short fictional